There's nothing new on the court website.
S EIGHT
JoinedPosts by S EIGHT
-
41
Candace Conti's Sur-Reply is Very Effective
by DNCall inat oral argument on august 13th, the court requested additional briefing from candace regarding the punitive damages being contested by watchtower.
from the case law cited in the brief it is demonstrated that the award of punitive damages is on solid legal ground.
although the court had until august 25 to render its decision as to whether the present judgment will be altered and watchtower granted a new trial, the court docket indicates that the court has entered an order already.
-
7
Do any of you all "Travel" for work?
by dreamgolfer inwould make for getting together to say hello and "stuff".
currently i travel in se usa up mid-atlantic area and to ne at times.
thanks and just "pm" me if you want to talk,.
-
S EIGHT
My travel to work consists of getting out of bed and walking 3 paces to my mini home office. I rarely meet anyone along the way apart from my doggy!
But, I'm frequently in Central London, UK so if anyone want's a Starbucks let me know :-)
S8
-
41
Candace Conti's Sur-Reply is Very Effective
by DNCall inat oral argument on august 13th, the court requested additional briefing from candace regarding the punitive damages being contested by watchtower.
from the case law cited in the brief it is demonstrated that the award of punitive damages is on solid legal ground.
although the court had until august 25 to render its decision as to whether the present judgment will be altered and watchtower granted a new trial, the court docket indicates that the court has entered an order already.
-
S EIGHT
That could be true. I'm certainly no lawyer but I've been stunned at some of the arguements put across by the Watchtower. And the longer this is going on the more desperate they seem to be clutching at silly ideas.
-
41
Candace Conti's Sur-Reply is Very Effective
by DNCall inat oral argument on august 13th, the court requested additional briefing from candace regarding the punitive damages being contested by watchtower.
from the case law cited in the brief it is demonstrated that the award of punitive damages is on solid legal ground.
although the court had until august 25 to render its decision as to whether the present judgment will be altered and watchtower granted a new trial, the court docket indicates that the court has entered an order already.
-
S EIGHT
so true
-
41
Candace Conti's Sur-Reply is Very Effective
by DNCall inat oral argument on august 13th, the court requested additional briefing from candace regarding the punitive damages being contested by watchtower.
from the case law cited in the brief it is demonstrated that the award of punitive damages is on solid legal ground.
although the court had until august 25 to render its decision as to whether the present judgment will be altered and watchtower granted a new trial, the court docket indicates that the court has entered an order already.
-
S EIGHT
The brief makes interesting reading and as mentioned above, it's all about money. However, the response to the Watchtower brief by Simons is a far more interesting read. Every case law point made by the Watchtower is proven to be misunderstood by Watchtower lawyers. It seems that they read the first few lines of a previous case and throw it in hoping no one will notice that it actually supports the Conti case. Laughable!!
S8
-
41
Candace Conti's Sur-Reply is Very Effective
by DNCall inat oral argument on august 13th, the court requested additional briefing from candace regarding the punitive damages being contested by watchtower.
from the case law cited in the brief it is demonstrated that the award of punitive damages is on solid legal ground.
although the court had until august 25 to render its decision as to whether the present judgment will be altered and watchtower granted a new trial, the court docket indicates that the court has entered an order already.
-
S EIGHT
The order has just gone live on the court webiste for download. You are correct, it relates to costs being awarded and added to the judgement.
S8
-
41
Candace Conti's Sur-Reply is Very Effective
by DNCall inat oral argument on august 13th, the court requested additional briefing from candace regarding the punitive damages being contested by watchtower.
from the case law cited in the brief it is demonstrated that the award of punitive damages is on solid legal ground.
although the court had until august 25 to render its decision as to whether the present judgment will be altered and watchtower granted a new trial, the court docket indicates that the court has entered an order already.
-
S EIGHT
Good point. I wonder what the daily interest is on $28m ???
S8
-
6
Nearly 3 years out and now I'm growing a beard
by S EIGHT inomg how low can i go?
.
and how low have you gone .
-
S EIGHT
Well this is officially where the beardy weirdys hand out then.
It grew real fast from stubble to short beard but now it seems to have slowed down. I'd like to see it much longer.
The wife is having trouble with it though when I try and face plant her.
S8
-
6
Nearly 3 years out and now I'm growing a beard
by S EIGHT inomg how low can i go?
.
and how low have you gone .
-
S EIGHT
OMG how low can I go?
And how low have you gone
-
317
Inviting djeggnog to discuss the blood doctrine
by jgnat indjeggnog invited me to start a new thread about the blood doctrine, which i am happy to do here.
his objection was my statement,.
"i've seen the blood video, a deceiving mix of scripture, fearmongering and pseudoscience, with plenty of lab coats in view.
-
S EIGHT
Still avoiding the fundementals:
Is it ok for a worldly person to commit a sin in order for a JW to benefit from the blood fractions donated by the worldly?
Can a brother donate blood so that another brother can benefit from the fractions extracted from the donated blood?
I cannot fornicate but I can watch other non JW's fornicating.
S8